It looks like I’ll be teaching my very first course next summer. This will be my chance to experiment a bit and get some practice on what kind of teacher I want to become. I have my role models but ultimately, to be successful, our teaching has to agree with our personalities. I have an inclusive personality so I tend to focus on giving everybody a chance to participate and get engaged. The key is to get students to participate. And as I’ve mentioned before, this is where I think blogging can be useful. Blogging has made me not only more aware of my surroundings but also more politically and socially engaged. If that sort of dynamics can be reproduced in the classroom some real learning can be achieved.
But how to do that? How exactly do I get 45 students to actively participate in a course blog? Do I make it an assignment? Do each student has to post something? How often? Under what criteria? How do I integrate it to the curriculum and what goes on in the classroom?
In order to get some ideas, I registered to a workshop last week on blogging offered by the Resource Centre of Academic Techonology, at U of T. I was very excited but unfortunately, unable to attend. A more urgent academic engagement came up and I had to miss it. So today I went by RCAT to ask if there were any handouts from the talk. They gave me not only a copy of the ppt presentation but also the presenter’s blog address where I could find further resources.
Her name is Michelle Mazar and her blog is subtitled Diary of a Subversive Librarian, which I think it’s quite brilliant. She wrote a very inspiring reflection about blogging and academia on the day of the workshop.In it she says:
(…)Which leads me to something that bonked me on the head yesterday while reviewing for Learning Inquiry. I read this fantastic article that used some extremely bang-on terminology: productive failure, and unproductive success.
Here’s what I’m currently considering: we tend to reward unproductive success more than anything. If a student walks into a class knowing the subject material, that student will probably do extremely well. If a student spends 3/4ths of the class struggling with the material and getting things wrong, not understanding, struggling with concepts, and then really gets it, that student will probably not do as well. But that student is actually learning, and demonstrating learning. We don’t have an effective way of rewarding real learning.
Which is the key reason why I object to switching out the word “student” with the word “learner”, though I know it’s trying to get at the same idea. We don’t know whether we have “learners” or not, on a grand scale. Often we have a group of already-knowledgeable students who will unproductively get As and we feel good about it the learning experience. How do we measure learning? Real learning? Going from confusion to understanding? How do we even see it when undergrads often don’t even open their mouths in class? Do we really have a “Learning Management System”? Really? How do we really support and reward learning rather than merely unproductive success?
So I think blogging done well, set up with good expectations and with a fostered honesty, can reveal the actual learning going on, and can give students the option of displaying the learning they’re doing. And we can reward it that way. If a student struggles for the first half of the course and demonstrates that struggle, and then suddenly GETS IT, you’ll have evidence of their learning. You can reward that, you can grade them according to how they learned and how articulate they can be about the way in which they learned and why. At the moment we grade them based on whether or not they get it fast enough, for the most part. So you can use these tools to support and encourage productive failure as a means toward productive success. I’m not saying it’s enough to just try. Unproductive failure isn’t the goal either. Failure that builds into understanding is productive.
I’ve began to consider this very process lately. I’ve had students who have clearly benefited from the class and through informal interaction with me showed me they “got it” at the end of the course. Yet, I could not reward their learning since these didn’t translate into their first assignments. I think there should be some room for that.
In her powerpoint presentation, Michelle gives some useful tips on using blogs effectively. My favourites are blogs as reflection paper and blogging as conversation. She suggests four possible ways to use a blog as a reflection paper:
- Pick a quotation from the reading and relate it to the lecture
- Pick a CC-licensed picture from flickr and relate it to the readings, lecture
- Pick a comment from a fellow student, agree or disagree with its content
- Ask a question that remains after the lecture and the reading
I think these could be easy to implement and would create a connection between readings and lecture as well as conversation among the students.
Her powerpoint doesn’t specify what she means by blogging as conversation but I’ll definitely ask her directly. This is very exciting stuff.

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 19, 2008 at 5:39 pm
Dana
She has some interesting points and suggestions (I’ll have to look more at some of her other comments). I use some of the suggestions in my world history course where I have an on-line discussion forum. Each week, I post a question that is somehow related to what we’ve been discussing in class. It usually doesn’t focus on specific facts or issues, but is more open-ended and makes the students present their own ideas.
The one problem I’ve found and not been able to fix is to get them talking to one another, rather than just responding to my question. I had hoped they would reflect on each others points, but they just click respond to my question and don’t even look at what other people have said. I wonder if I used a blog instead of the already existing discussion board software on WebCT if this would change. It might be too unmanageable for 125 students, but I think quite effective for a smaller group.
November 19, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Rochelle
Hi there!
I’m sorry you couldn’t come to the seminar, but I’m glad to see the conversation you’re starting here!
I’m not really a ppt person, this is only my second ever attempt at using it, and I deliberately didn’t put a lot of content into those slides. They prevent me from actually thinking while I’m talking! But I recorded the session. I was going to try and clean it up a bit first, but I think I’ll just upload it and and post it. It will be there today (I hope).
I’m glad others are enthusiastic about this stuff!
November 19, 2008 at 6:56 pm
guerson
Dana,
Do you require them to post a response to your question each week? Maybe you can ask them to post a response and a comment to someone else’s response? Although with 125 students that can be a lot trickier… Do they get participation marks for this?
Michelle,
Thanks for making your recording available!! I’ll listen to it for sure and probably get back to you with lots of questions…
November 19, 2008 at 7:07 pm
Rochelle
Sadly the quality isn’t that hot, but…hey, I’ll put it out there. I’m just trying to clean it up a little in audacity.
November 19, 2008 at 7:27 pm
Rochelle
It’s here: http://www.mazar.ca/2008/11/19/rcat-blogging-talk/
November 20, 2008 at 4:29 am
Dana
Yes, I require them to post each week. It’s all part of their discussion participation grade. I think suggesting they respond to both is a great idea!
November 20, 2008 at 1:25 pm
jeremy hunsinger
one way of ensuring that they read and respond to each other is to assign it. ‘each week you are expected to respond to your colleagues. (currently, I expect that a minimal effort for the week is will be around 3 responses, but students who want full credit will engage fully in the art of conversation each week and likely will exceed the minimal amount by significant margins).’
November 21, 2008 at 6:48 am
Dana
Jeremy, that’s a good idea. Is it hard to keep track of? I’m just concerned as I have over 100 students in the class and am worried I’d end up spending a lot of time tracking their responses.